https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200824 Section 30 of the Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934 was held to apply to mortgage debt because it operates on any claim in respect of a "debt" within Section 7(1). The narrower definition of "debtor" in Section 7(2) was treated as confined to the debt conciliation scheme in Part IV and not as a condition for invoking Section 30 in Part V. The court followed the prior Full Bench view, approved by the Supreme Court, and rejected the contrary single-judge approach. Damdupat therefore limited the decree to the statutory ceiling, while proved expenses and consequential interest were also allowed. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:07:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200824 Section 30 of the Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934 was held to apply to mortgage debt because it operates on any claim in respect of a "debt" within Section 7(1). The narrower definition of "debtor" in Section 7(2) was treated as confined to the debt conciliation scheme in Part IV and not as a condition for invoking Section 30 in Part V. The court followed the prior Full Bench view, approved by the Supreme Court, and rejected the contrary single-judge approach. Damdupat therefore limited the decree to the statutory ceiling, while proved expenses and consequential interest were also allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200824