https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200823 The Supreme Court held that the respondent had no right to continue beyond the contractual period and that her services could not be regularized based solely on the length of service. The Court focused on the terms of appointment rather than the authority to abolish posts, emphasizing that once the contractual period ended, the right to remain in the post ceased. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment, directing the continuation of services until the end of the calendar year, with the possibility of regularization at the appellant's discretion. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:29:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200823 The Supreme Court held that the respondent had no right to continue beyond the contractual period and that her services could not be regularized based solely on the length of service. The Court focused on the terms of appointment rather than the authority to abolish posts, emphasizing that once the contractual period ended, the right to remain in the post ceased. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment, directing the continuation of services until the end of the calendar year, with the possibility of regularization at the appellant's discretion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200823