<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the disallowance of the loss from derivative transactions. The Tribunal found that the loss claimed was genuine, supported by evidence, and the modifications made by the broker were within permissible limits. Therefore, the disallowance of the loss amounting to Rs. 5,46,885 was directed to be deleted. The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 30-08-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the disallowance of the loss from derivative transactions. The Tribunal found that the loss claimed was genuine, supported by evidence, and the modifications made by the broker were within permissible limits. Therefore, the disallowance of the loss amounting to Rs. 5,46,885 was directed to be deleted. The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 30-08-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>