<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 298 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200820</link>
    <description>Regularisation policies fixing cut-off dates, requiring Employment Exchange sponsorship, and insisting on prescribed qualifications at initial appointment are treated as valid safeguards against irregular or backdoor entry. A blanket direction to regularise all ad hoc or temporary employees after one year of service is unsustainable because regularisation depends on vacancy position, qualifications, recruitment method, reservation requirements, and service record. Similar broad directions for work-charged employees, daily wagers, casual labourers, and workmen are too general, although existing governmental schemes and appropriate absorption policies may govern eligible cases. A direction for equal pay for equal work must rest on a clear and workable entitlement framework; a vague order is not implementable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 298 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200820</link>
      <description>Regularisation policies fixing cut-off dates, requiring Employment Exchange sponsorship, and insisting on prescribed qualifications at initial appointment are treated as valid safeguards against irregular or backdoor entry. A blanket direction to regularise all ad hoc or temporary employees after one year of service is unsustainable because regularisation depends on vacancy position, qualifications, recruitment method, reservation requirements, and service record. Similar broad directions for work-charged employees, daily wagers, casual labourers, and workmen are too general, although existing governmental schemes and appropriate absorption policies may govern eligible cases. A direction for equal pay for equal work must rest on a clear and workable entitlement framework; a vague order is not implementable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>