<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 491 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200816</link>
    <description>The Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959 was construed to cover Government establishments and public sector establishments because the statutory definition of &quot;establishment&quot; includes Government-controlled offices. The Act, however, requires compulsory notification of vacancies only; it does not oblige employers to recruit solely from candidates sponsored by Employment Exchanges, and section 4(4) negatives any such mandatory recruitment rule. Government instructions requiring recruitment through Employment Exchanges were upheld as valid for Government departments because they do not offend Articles 14 and 16 and promote equality of opportunity, but they do not compulsorily bind statutory bodies or private employers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 491 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200816</link>
      <description>The Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959 was construed to cover Government establishments and public sector establishments because the statutory definition of &quot;establishment&quot; includes Government-controlled offices. The Act, however, requires compulsory notification of vacancies only; it does not oblige employers to recruit solely from candidates sponsored by Employment Exchanges, and section 4(4) negatives any such mandatory recruitment rule. Government instructions requiring recruitment through Employment Exchanges were upheld as valid for Government departments because they do not offend Articles 14 and 16 and promote equality of opportunity, but they do not compulsorily bind statutory bodies or private employers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>