<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12790</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the transfer of shares to the firm constituted a transfer of capital asset under the Income-tax Act. However, no profit or capital gains accrued to the assessees from the transfer as it was considered a mere adjustment of rights within the partnership, not resulting in actual income or gain for the partners. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessees on the issues of profit and capital gains arising from the transfer of shares to the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12790</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the transfer of shares to the firm constituted a transfer of capital asset under the Income-tax Act. However, no profit or capital gains accrued to the assessees from the transfer as it was considered a mere adjustment of rights within the partnership, not resulting in actual income or gain for the partners. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessees on the issues of profit and capital gains arising from the transfer of shares to the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>