https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200813 The SC set aside the HC's judgments, declaring the appointments made by the Revenue Commissioner invalid and non-est in law. The SC upheld the State's cancellation of these appointments, emphasizing that they were made without proper authority and violated constitutional mandates under Articles 14 and 16. The Court ruled that the respondents were not entitled to hold the posts or receive salaries, as they failed to prove the legality of their appointments. The SC stressed the importance of adhering to constitutional provisions and ensuring a transparent recruitment process. Appeals were allowed. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200813 The SC set aside the HC's judgments, declaring the appointments made by the Revenue Commissioner invalid and non-est in law. The SC upheld the State's cancellation of these appointments, emphasizing that they were made without proper authority and violated constitutional mandates under Articles 14 and 16. The Court ruled that the respondents were not entitled to hold the posts or receive salaries, as they failed to prove the legality of their appointments. The SC stressed the importance of adhering to constitutional provisions and ensuring a transparent recruitment process. Appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200813