<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12788</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by including a sales tax liability in the order under section 263, which was not addressed by the Commissioner of Income-tax. The Court emphasized adherence to specific directions from superior authorities. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the departmental appeal without addressing the Commissioner&#039;s findings was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal was directed to reexamine the sales tax addition and determine its validity in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12788</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by including a sales tax liability in the order under section 263, which was not addressed by the Commissioner of Income-tax. The Court emphasized adherence to specific directions from superior authorities. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the departmental appeal without addressing the Commissioner&#039;s findings was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal was directed to reexamine the sales tax addition and determine its validity in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>