https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200811 The Employees Insurance Court is treated as a court for Limitation Act purposes because it exercises judicial power, gives binding and final decisions, has powers akin to a civil court, and operates within a statutory scheme excluding ordinary civil court jurisdiction over assigned matters. On that basis, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to restoration proceedings under Rule 26(5) of the Bombay Employees Insurance Court Rules, 1959. The 30-day restoration period under Rule 26(5) is consistent with Article 122, and in any event Section 29(2) permits Section 5 because the special law does not expressly exclude it. en-us Wed, 16 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:02:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200811 The Employees Insurance Court is treated as a court for Limitation Act purposes because it exercises judicial power, gives binding and final decisions, has powers akin to a civil court, and operates within a statutory scheme excluding ordinary civil court jurisdiction over assigned matters. On that basis, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to restoration proceedings under Rule 26(5) of the Bombay Employees Insurance Court Rules, 1959. The 30-day restoration period under Rule 26(5) is consistent with Article 122, and in any event Section 29(2) permits Section 5 because the special law does not expressly exclude it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200811