https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200809 Under the Emergency Risks (Factories Insurance) Act, 1962, the appellate authority could consider condonation of delay because the Act prescribed a 30-day appeal period but did not expressly exclude Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Applying Section 29(2), the court held that delay may be excused on sufficient cause being shown, and an appeal should not be rejected as time-barred without considering that request. The time-bar dismissal was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be heard on merits after opportunity of hearing. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200809 Under the Emergency Risks (Factories Insurance) Act, 1962, the appellate authority could consider condonation of delay because the Act prescribed a 30-day appeal period but did not expressly exclude Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Applying Section 29(2), the court held that delay may be excused on sufficient cause being shown, and an appeal should not be rejected as time-barred without considering that request. The time-bar dismissal was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be heard on merits after opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200809