<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1271 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold a penalty of Rs. 7,88,986 under section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for non-payment of self-assessment tax due to financial difficulties caused by a global recession in the gems and jewellery industry. The appellant&#039;s evidence of negative fund flow and bank balance during the relevant period supported the claim of severe financial hardships, leading to the deletion of the penalty by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1271 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold a penalty of Rs. 7,88,986 under section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for non-payment of self-assessment tax due to financial difficulties caused by a global recession in the gems and jewellery industry. The appellant&#039;s evidence of negative fund flow and bank balance during the relevant period supported the claim of severe financial hardships, leading to the deletion of the penalty by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>