https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200808 A writ petition challenging an order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax framework was held not maintainable because an effective statutory appeal was available. The petitioner did not show any special circumstance to establish that the appellate remedy was inefficacious. Where the statute provides an adequate alternative remedy, the normal course is to pursue that remedy before invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition was therefore liable to be dismissed on the ground of availability of an efficacious alternative remedy. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:59:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200808 A writ petition challenging an order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax framework was held not maintainable because an effective statutory appeal was available. The petitioner did not show any special circumstance to establish that the appellate remedy was inefficacious. Where the statute provides an adequate alternative remedy, the normal course is to pursue that remedy before invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition was therefore liable to be dismissed on the ground of availability of an efficacious alternative remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200808