<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359122</link>
    <description>The article examines whether unutilized MODVAT/CENVAT credit can be refunded in cash when manufacturing activity has ceased or the credit cannot otherwise be used, and whether dismissal of an earlier special leave petition amounts to a declaration of law binding on later disputes. It surveys conflicting authorities on refund, merger, and the precedential effect of SLP dismissal, and notes that the relevant legal question was left open in the later Supreme Court order. The Court records a prima facie disagreement with the earlier coordinate Bench view and states that the issue requires consideration by a larger Bench; no final ruling on refund is rendered, and the matter is referred for consideration of a larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359122</link>
      <description>The article examines whether unutilized MODVAT/CENVAT credit can be refunded in cash when manufacturing activity has ceased or the credit cannot otherwise be used, and whether dismissal of an earlier special leave petition amounts to a declaration of law binding on later disputes. It surveys conflicting authorities on refund, merger, and the precedential effect of SLP dismissal, and notes that the relevant legal question was left open in the later Supreme Court order. The Court records a prima facie disagreement with the earlier coordinate Bench view and states that the issue requires consideration by a larger Bench; no final ruling on refund is rendered, and the matter is referred for consideration of a larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>