<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359122</link>
    <description>Dismissal of a Special Leave Petition at the leave stage does not, by itself, cause merger or amount to a conclusive declaration of law; only a reasoned appellate determination by the Supreme Court has that effect. Applying Kunhayammed, the Bombay High Court noted that the earlier SLP orders, including one recording a concession and another leaving the issue open, did not settle the law under Article 141. It also recorded conflicting authority on cash refund of unutilized Cenvat/Modvat credit, including claims arising on closure of manufacturing and surrender of registration, and therefore referred the refund questions to a Larger Bench for authoritative decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1233 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359122</link>
      <description>Dismissal of a Special Leave Petition at the leave stage does not, by itself, cause merger or amount to a conclusive declaration of law; only a reasoned appellate determination by the Supreme Court has that effect. Applying Kunhayammed, the Bombay High Court noted that the earlier SLP orders, including one recording a concession and another leaving the issue open, did not settle the law under Article 141. It also recorded conflicting authority on cash refund of unutilized Cenvat/Modvat credit, including claims arising on closure of manufacturing and surrender of registration, and therefore referred the refund questions to a Larger Bench for authoritative decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>