https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359103 HC ruled in favor of petitioner, directing immediate release of loader/tipper without security. Court found no E-Way Bill violation since requirement was not in effect on seizure date. Allowed petitioner to challenge penalty order through appeal under Section 107 of U.P. GST Act. State counsel instructed to file reply within specified timeframe. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359103 HC ruled in favor of petitioner, directing immediate release of loader/tipper without security. Court found no E-Way Bill violation since requirement was not in effect on seizure date. Allowed petitioner to challenge penalty order through appeal under Section 107 of U.P. GST Act. State counsel instructed to file reply within specified timeframe. Case-Laws GST Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359103