<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the toll collection activity was not liable for Service Tax under Business Auxiliary Service. The decision emphasized the distinction between Business Auxiliary Service and toll collection operations, citing legal precedents and interpretations to support the judgment. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and providing relief by clarifying the non-applicability of Service Tax on toll collection activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:33:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the toll collection activity was not liable for Service Tax under Business Auxiliary Service. The decision emphasized the distinction between Business Auxiliary Service and toll collection operations, citing legal precedents and interpretations to support the judgment. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and providing relief by clarifying the non-applicability of Service Tax on toll collection activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>