<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1183 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order on grounds of limitation. The appellant&#039;s argument that the proceedings were time-barred due to delayed initiation was upheld, leading to the allowance of all appeals. The decision highlighted the importance of timely issuance of protective show cause notices by the department and emphasized the burden of proof on the Revenue to establish tax liability under specific service categories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1183 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order on grounds of limitation. The appellant&#039;s argument that the proceedings were time-barred due to delayed initiation was upheld, leading to the allowance of all appeals. The decision highlighted the importance of timely issuance of protective show cause notices by the department and emphasized the burden of proof on the Revenue to establish tax liability under specific service categories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>