https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359055 The Bench concluded that the Settlement Commission was not the appropriate forum to decide the disputed issues in the case involving Service Tax demands, penalties, and eligibility for immunity. They ordered the case to be sent back to the Adjudicating Authority for detailed adjudication based on all facts and evidence, as the applicant had not fully disclosed their tax liability. The Bench exercised its powers under relevant provisions to direct the Adjudicating Authority to proceed with the case as if no settlement application had been filed. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359055 The Bench concluded that the Settlement Commission was not the appropriate forum to decide the disputed issues in the case involving Service Tax demands, penalties, and eligibility for immunity. They ordered the case to be sent back to the Adjudicating Authority for detailed adjudication based on all facts and evidence, as the applicant had not fully disclosed their tax liability. The Bench exercised its powers under relevant provisions to direct the Adjudicating Authority to proceed with the case as if no settlement application had been filed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359055