<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1159 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359048</link>
    <description>Durable and returnable plastic crates, once received as duty-paid virgin inputs and used in packing, do not attract a fresh separate-accounting requirement under Rule 6 when they are returned for reuse. The article states that Rule 6 is directed at virgin inputs entering the manufacturing stream, not used crates already consumed once and reintroduced into factory use. Relying on the assessee&#039;s earlier case, which had been sustained by the High Court, it concludes that no reversal or payment is payable merely because the same crates are repeatedly used for packing dutiable and exempted products, and the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 06:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1159 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359048</link>
      <description>Durable and returnable plastic crates, once received as duty-paid virgin inputs and used in packing, do not attract a fresh separate-accounting requirement under Rule 6 when they are returned for reuse. The article states that Rule 6 is directed at virgin inputs entering the manufacturing stream, not used crates already consumed once and reintroduced into factory use. Relying on the assessee&#039;s earlier case, which had been sustained by the High Court, it concludes that no reversal or payment is payable merely because the same crates are repeatedly used for packing dutiable and exempted products, and the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>