https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359036 The Tribunal dismissed both parties' appeals, upholding the differential duty demand and interest liability. Penalty imposition under Section 11AC was rejected for the appellants, with the Tribunal emphasizing the absence of necessary ingredients for penalty imposition. The Department's appeals were also rejected due to ongoing litigation, rendering penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules inapplicable. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359036 The Tribunal dismissed both parties' appeals, upholding the differential duty demand and interest liability. Penalty imposition under Section 11AC was rejected for the appellants, with the Tribunal emphasizing the absence of necessary ingredients for penalty imposition. The Department's appeals were also rejected due to ongoing litigation, rendering penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules inapplicable. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359036