<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200801</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s representation for the provisional release of goods not falling under prohibited categories or facing trademark violations. The respondents were allowed to impose conditions for release within 15 days. The court disposed of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200801</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s representation for the provisional release of goods not falling under prohibited categories or facing trademark violations. The respondents were allowed to impose conditions for release within 15 days. The court disposed of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>