<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (5) TMI 25 - SIND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200787</link>
    <description>Income-tax exemption is determined by the law and notifications in force for the assessment year, not merely by those operating when the income accrued in the previous year. The distinction between tax rates and exemptions was rejected because both form part of the assessment machinery. The later notification applicable to the assessment year therefore controlled the extent of exemption, and the assessee was entitled only to the limited exemption then in force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (5) TMI 25 - SIND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200787</link>
      <description>Income-tax exemption is determined by the law and notifications in force for the assessment year, not merely by those operating when the income accrued in the previous year. The distinction between tax rates and exemptions was rejected because both form part of the assessment machinery. The later notification applicable to the assessment year therefore controlled the extent of exemption, and the assessee was entitled only to the limited exemption then in force.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>