https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200782 Where a claim over attached property is pending, an execution court should not refuse a stay by presuming collusion or lack of locus against a transferee who asserts bona fide purchase with supporting material. The dispute over whether the sale was genuine and whether the attachment claim could be resisted required examination of evidence under the statutory scheme governing claims and objections to attachment, including the attachment communication requirements. The rejection of the stay application was therefore not justified, and the matter required fresh consideration by the court below. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:52:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200782 Where a claim over attached property is pending, an execution court should not refuse a stay by presuming collusion or lack of locus against a transferee who asserts bona fide purchase with supporting material. The dispute over whether the sale was genuine and whether the attachment claim could be resisted required examination of evidence under the statutory scheme governing claims and objections to attachment, including the attachment communication requirements. The rejection of the stay application was therefore not justified, and the matter required fresh consideration by the court below. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200782