<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1141 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359030</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a seizure order, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of U.P. GST Act, 2017. The court declined to entertain the petition at this stage, emphasizing the availability of an alternative legal recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1141 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359030</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a seizure order, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of U.P. GST Act, 2017. The court declined to entertain the petition at this stage, emphasizing the availability of an alternative legal recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>