<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1127 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the defective notice issued under Section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c). The decision was based on judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in SSA&#039;s Emerald Meadows, which favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1127 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the defective notice issued under Section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c). The decision was based on judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in SSA&#039;s Emerald Meadows, which favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>