<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358994</link>
    <description>Accumulated Cenvat credit on common input services, when reversed before utilisation, does not create interest liability merely because it was initially availed. Credit utilisation remained within the limit permitted under Rule 6(3)(c) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, while the unutilised excess balance was reversed. On this basis, neither interest nor penalty was payable, and the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358994</link>
      <description>Accumulated Cenvat credit on common input services, when reversed before utilisation, does not create interest liability merely because it was initially availed. Credit utilisation remained within the limit permitted under Rule 6(3)(c) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, while the unutilised excess balance was reversed. On this basis, neither interest nor penalty was payable, and the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>