<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358994</link>
    <description>Where accumulated Cenvat credit on common input services is reversed before utilisation, no interest liability arises because the credit is only availed and not actually used. The note applies the principle that reversal of excess credit before consumption negates interest, and non-utilisation of the balance credit does not by itself attract penalty. On that basis, the stated conclusion is that interest and penalty were not payable and the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358994</link>
      <description>Where accumulated Cenvat credit on common input services is reversed before utilisation, no interest liability arises because the credit is only availed and not actually used. The note applies the principle that reversal of excess credit before consumption negates interest, and non-utilisation of the balance credit does not by itself attract penalty. On that basis, the stated conclusion is that interest and penalty were not payable and the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>