<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1095 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358984</link>
    <description>The judgment confirmed the demand for tax and interest, not contested by the appellant. The penalty under section 78 was set aside due to the absence of intent to evade payment, while penalties under sections 76 and 77 were also annulled. The decision was made by the tribunal in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:05:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1095 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358984</link>
      <description>The judgment confirmed the demand for tax and interest, not contested by the appellant. The penalty under section 78 was set aside due to the absence of intent to evade payment, while penalties under sections 76 and 77 were also annulled. The decision was made by the tribunal in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>