<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358980</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting the appellant the right to claim refund/self-credit of education cess/higher education cess and excess duty paid. The decision was based on the finding that the cess arises from duty payable by the appellant, and excess payment due to miscalculation is considered a deposit, not duty under the Central Excise Act. The impugned orders were set aside, providing the appellant with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358980</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting the appellant the right to claim refund/self-credit of education cess/higher education cess and excess duty paid. The decision was based on the finding that the cess arises from duty payable by the appellant, and excess payment due to miscalculation is considered a deposit, not duty under the Central Excise Act. The impugned orders were set aside, providing the appellant with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>