https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358973 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to take the disputed Cenvat credit as there was no irregularity in the process. The proceedings against the appellant were found to be initiated as a sequel to the settled proceedings involving RK Industries and Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Consequently, the appellant was granted the credit, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:05:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358973 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to take the disputed Cenvat credit as there was no irregularity in the process. The proceedings against the appellant were found to be initiated as a sequel to the settled proceedings involving RK Industries and Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Consequently, the appellant was granted the credit, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358973