<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1083 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appeal, allowing the respondent to avail Cenvat credit on finished goods under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, provided appropriate excise duty was paid upon re-issuance. The decision clarified the distinction between inputs and finished goods for credit purposes, emphasizing the specific conditions outlined in Rule 16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1083 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appeal, allowing the respondent to avail Cenvat credit on finished goods under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, provided appropriate excise duty was paid upon re-issuance. The decision clarified the distinction between inputs and finished goods for credit purposes, emphasizing the specific conditions outlined in Rule 16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>