<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1382 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200776</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the profit from the sale of land should be classified as Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) for consistency with previous years. It emphasized the importance of uniform tax treatment and found no justification for the Assessing Officer&#039;s deviation from past practices. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee for all assessment years were allowed, reversing the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1382 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200776</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the profit from the sale of land should be classified as Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) for consistency with previous years. It emphasized the importance of uniform tax treatment and found no justification for the Assessing Officer&#039;s deviation from past practices. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee for all assessment years were allowed, reversing the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>