<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1210 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld additions related to unexplained loans and cash credits due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee. However, additions based on estimated interest and advances were deleted for lack of proof. The Tribunal allowed appeals partly, considering the evidence presented in each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1210 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld additions related to unexplained loans and cash credits due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee. However, additions based on estimated interest and advances were deleted for lack of proof. The Tribunal allowed appeals partly, considering the evidence presented in each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>