<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 972 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200770</link>
    <description>Acceptance of the final bill without protest meant no arbitrable dispute survived in relation to claim item No. 2 under the contractual arbitration clause, so the award was set aside to that limited extent. The Court did not extend that objection to the remaining claims because no specific challenge had been raised below in relation to those items, and the rest of the award was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 18:57:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 972 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200770</link>
      <description>Acceptance of the final bill without protest meant no arbitrable dispute survived in relation to claim item No. 2 under the contractual arbitration clause, so the award was set aside to that limited extent. The Court did not extend that objection to the remaining claims because no specific challenge had been raised below in relation to those items, and the rest of the award was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>