<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Custodian Held Liable for Duty on Pilfered Goods; &#039;Short Shipment&#039; Claim Rejected by Adjudicating Authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39003</link>
    <description>Pilferage - there is no reason to accept the claim of &#039;short shipment&#039; - the adjudicating authority has rightly fastened the liability for duty on the pilfered goods on the custodian, who is the appellant in the present proceedings. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 08:50:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 08:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Custodian Held Liable for Duty on Pilfered Goods; &#039;Short Shipment&#039; Claim Rejected by Adjudicating Authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39003</link>
      <description>Pilferage - there is no reason to accept the claim of &#039;short shipment&#039; - the adjudicating authority has rightly fastened the liability for duty on the pilfered goods on the custodian, who is the appellant in the present proceedings. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 08:50:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>