<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1074 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358963</link>
    <description>HC quashed seizure and penalty orders against trader transporting computer parts inter-state. Despite temporary TDF absence, court found no evidence of tax evasion intent. Goods and truck were ordered released without security, emphasizing procedural technicalities cannot justify punitive actions when no substantive tax violation occurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1074 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358963</link>
      <description>HC quashed seizure and penalty orders against trader transporting computer parts inter-state. Despite temporary TDF absence, court found no evidence of tax evasion intent. Goods and truck were ordered released without security, emphasizing procedural technicalities cannot justify punitive actions when no substantive tax violation occurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>