<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1073 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358962</link>
    <description>The Court ordered the release of goods and vehicle seized under the U.P. GST Act, 2017, due to the absence of an E-Way Bill. The petitioner, a registered trader, had the E-Way Bill downloaded and produced to the authority on the same day of interception. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the release of the goods and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing security other than cash and bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the concerned authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1073 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358962</link>
      <description>The Court ordered the release of goods and vehicle seized under the U.P. GST Act, 2017, due to the absence of an E-Way Bill. The petitioner, a registered trader, had the E-Way Bill downloaded and produced to the authority on the same day of interception. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the release of the goods and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing security other than cash and bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the concerned authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>