<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1064 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358953</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. It directed the exclusion of Infosys BPO Ltd. and set aside the inclusion of Acropetal Technologies Ltd. for further investigation. The tribunal upheld the inclusion of R. System International Ltd. and Caliber Point Business Solutions Ltd. as comparables, emphasizing the importance of accurate comparability analysis based on functional similarity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1064 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358953</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. It directed the exclusion of Infosys BPO Ltd. and set aside the inclusion of Acropetal Technologies Ltd. for further investigation. The tribunal upheld the inclusion of R. System International Ltd. and Caliber Point Business Solutions Ltd. as comparables, emphasizing the importance of accurate comparability analysis based on functional similarity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>