https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358948 The revenue's appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 was allowed, as the tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not have the power to direct the AO to verify certain facts. The assessee's cross objection for the same year was allowed for statistical purposes. In the assessment year 2012-13, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed, with the tribunal allowing depreciation on both tangible and intangible assets. However, the revenue's appeal for the same year was dismissed. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:02:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358948 The revenue's appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 was allowed, as the tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not have the power to direct the AO to verify certain facts. The assessee's cross objection for the same year was allowed for statistical purposes. In the assessment year 2012-13, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed, with the tribunal allowing depreciation on both tangible and intangible assets. However, the revenue's appeal for the same year was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358948