<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12743</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B were invalid for want of a notice by the Commissioner and whether the assessment was void ab initio. The HC held that notices issued by the AO to whom the case records were transferred were valid, and Chapter XIV-B was properly invoked. It further held that s.158BG does not mandate issuance of any notice by the Commissioner; it only requires prior approval of the Commissioner before the AO passes the assessment order, which had been duly obtained. Consequently, no jurisdictional defect or illegality vitiated the assessment, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 19:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12743</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B were invalid for want of a notice by the Commissioner and whether the assessment was void ab initio. The HC held that notices issued by the AO to whom the case records were transferred were valid, and Chapter XIV-B was properly invoked. It further held that s.158BG does not mandate issuance of any notice by the Commissioner; it only requires prior approval of the Commissioner before the AO passes the assessment order, which had been duly obtained. Consequently, no jurisdictional defect or illegality vitiated the assessment, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>