<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358934</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant&#039;s services under &quot;Supply of Tangible Goods Service&quot; and confirmed the service tax demand with interest and penalties. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the service tax demand under the reverse charge mechanism for services received from abroad. Consequently, the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358934</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant&#039;s services under &quot;Supply of Tangible Goods Service&quot; and confirmed the service tax demand with interest and penalties. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the service tax demand under the reverse charge mechanism for services received from abroad. Consequently, the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>