<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1042 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358931</link>
    <description>The appeal arose from a dispute over the admissibility of Cenvat Credit for service tax on renting of immovable property service. The Tribunal, considering relevant case laws, held that the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat Credit for the taxes paid on various services. As a result, the impugned Order-in-Original was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1042 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358931</link>
      <description>The appeal arose from a dispute over the admissibility of Cenvat Credit for service tax on renting of immovable property service. The Tribunal, considering relevant case laws, held that the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat Credit for the taxes paid on various services. As a result, the impugned Order-in-Original was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>