<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1036 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358925</link>
    <description>For service tax demanded on reverse charge basis for GTA services, mere non-filing of ST-3 returns and delayed payment was held insufficient to establish wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade tax. In the absence of material showing deliberate suppression, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, and the demand for the extended period was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1036 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358925</link>
      <description>For service tax demanded on reverse charge basis for GTA services, mere non-filing of ST-3 returns and delayed payment was held insufficient to establish wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade tax. In the absence of material showing deliberate suppression, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, and the demand for the extended period was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>