https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358919 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision, dismissing the Revenue's writ petition challenging the order. The Court found no merit in the objections raised post-decision, as the Revenue's participation during the proceedings implied consent and prevented later claims of non-compliance. The Settlement Commission's revised duty liability was accepted and paid, with the Court refusing to interfere in its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358919 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision, dismissing the Revenue's writ petition challenging the order. The Court found no merit in the objections raised post-decision, as the Revenue's participation during the proceedings implied consent and prevented later claims of non-compliance. The Settlement Commission's revised duty liability was accepted and paid, with the Court refusing to interfere in its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358919