<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 47 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, setting aside the assessment order for the assessment year 1982-83 due to the assessee&#039;s suppression of the true value of the property sold, causing substantial prejudice to the Revenue. The Commissioner&#039;s power to revise orders prejudicial to the Revenue was deemed appropriate in this case, as the significant discrepancy in the reported and actual amounts justified setting aside the assessment order. The Commissioner&#039;s discretion to enhance, modify, or cancel the assessment was upheld, with the assessee having recourse to appellate and other remedies against the revised assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 47 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, setting aside the assessment order for the assessment year 1982-83 due to the assessee&#039;s suppression of the true value of the property sold, causing substantial prejudice to the Revenue. The Commissioner&#039;s power to revise orders prejudicial to the Revenue was deemed appropriate in this case, as the significant discrepancy in the reported and actual amounts justified setting aside the assessment order. The Commissioner&#039;s discretion to enhance, modify, or cancel the assessment was upheld, with the assessee having recourse to appellate and other remedies against the revised assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>