https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358909 The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the impugned order was unsustainable. The decision was based on the expert opinion provided by the Chartered Engineer and the application of relevant legal precedents to the case at hand. The tribunal noted that the items in question were used as support structures in the factory premises and for fabrication in pollution control equipment, supported by the Chartered Engineer's certificate. The tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' findings and set aside the demands raised by the Revenue, granting the appellant eligibility for CENVAT Credit on Central Excise duty paid on the specific items. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jun 2018 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358909 The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the impugned order was unsustainable. The decision was based on the expert opinion provided by the Chartered Engineer and the application of relevant legal precedents to the case at hand. The tribunal noted that the items in question were used as support structures in the factory premises and for fabrication in pollution control equipment, supported by the Chartered Engineer's certificate. The tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' findings and set aside the demands raised by the Revenue, granting the appellant eligibility for CENVAT Credit on Central Excise duty paid on the specific items. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358909