https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358907 Clear communication to the jurisdictional officer that duty was being paid under protest was held sufficient to establish protest for refund purposes. In the absence of any explicit departmental rejection of that protest, the lower authority's contrary view was found misdirected. The payment was therefore treated as made under protest, with the result that the refund claim was not barred by limitation and the adverse order was set aside. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:00:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358907 Clear communication to the jurisdictional officer that duty was being paid under protest was held sufficient to establish protest for refund purposes. In the absence of any explicit departmental rejection of that protest, the lower authority's contrary view was found misdirected. The payment was therefore treated as made under protest, with the result that the refund claim was not barred by limitation and the adverse order was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358907