https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358901 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application seeking rectification of a mistake in the Final Order related to duty demand quantification. The Tribunal found that the errors highlighted by the appellant were not apparent on the face of the record and required extensive arguments, which were deemed impermissible for reconsideration through a Review of Order application. The Tribunal emphasized that errors apparent on the face of the record should be easily identifiable without the need for detailed arguments. Consequently, the ROM application was dismissed, and the Tribunal held that it could not be used as a means to rehear the appeal. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358901 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application seeking rectification of a mistake in the Final Order related to duty demand quantification. The Tribunal found that the errors highlighted by the appellant were not apparent on the face of the record and required extensive arguments, which were deemed impermissible for reconsideration through a Review of Order application. The Tribunal emphasized that errors apparent on the face of the record should be easily identifiable without the need for detailed arguments. Consequently, the ROM application was dismissed, and the Tribunal held that it could not be used as a means to rehear the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358901