https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200762 The Bombay HC considered whether petitioners could claim incentive benefits under Notification No. 43 (RE-2013) / 2009-14 dated 25.09.2013 and followed the earlier binding view that the same notification fell within the Division Bench ruling in JSW Steel v. Union of India. Finding no material distinction from the prior writ petition, the Court applied that precedent to the present matter. The petitioners were accordingly held entitled to the benefit claimed under the notification in terms of the earlier Division Bench judgment. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 06:00:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200762 The Bombay HC considered whether petitioners could claim incentive benefits under Notification No. 43 (RE-2013) / 2009-14 dated 25.09.2013 and followed the earlier binding view that the same notification fell within the Division Bench ruling in JSW Steel v. Union of India. Finding no material distinction from the prior writ petition, the Court applied that precedent to the present matter. The petitioners were accordingly held entitled to the benefit claimed under the notification in terms of the earlier Division Bench judgment. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200762