<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1493 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to adopt Rs. 900 per sq. yard for land and Rs. 100 per sq. ft. for the built-up area as fair market values for computing capital gains. The Tribunal emphasized that SRO values are not scientifically prepared and cannot serve as fair market values, and the Registered Valuer&#039;s report lacked specific comparable cases to support a higher valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1493 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to adopt Rs. 900 per sq. yard for land and Rs. 100 per sq. ft. for the built-up area as fair market values for computing capital gains. The Tribunal emphasized that SRO values are not scientifically prepared and cannot serve as fair market values, and the Registered Valuer&#039;s report lacked specific comparable cases to support a higher valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>