https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200741 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of all disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal concluded that the equipment qualified for 40% depreciation as life-saving, allowed deductions for belated ESI contributions if paid before the due date, rejected disallowance of marketing expenses, and instructed deletion of disallowance for consumables and repairs expenses. The order was pronounced on April 22, 2016. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:35:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200741 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of all disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal concluded that the equipment qualified for 40% depreciation as life-saving, allowed deductions for belated ESI contributions if paid before the due date, rejected disallowance of marketing expenses, and instructed deletion of disallowance for consumables and repairs expenses. The order was pronounced on April 22, 2016. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200741