<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1008 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358897</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to pending winding up proceedings before the High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that initiating an application under Section 10 was not permissible if winding up proceedings were already underway against the Corporate Debtor. The ruling in previous cases extended to both Financial and Operational Creditors, highlighting that filing a petition under Section 7 or 9 against a Corporate Debtor involved in winding up proceedings was not maintainable. The Tribunal set aside costs imposed on the appellant, concluding the application was not viable alongside existing winding up proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=517437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1008 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358897</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to pending winding up proceedings before the High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that initiating an application under Section 10 was not permissible if winding up proceedings were already underway against the Corporate Debtor. The ruling in previous cases extended to both Financial and Operational Creditors, highlighting that filing a petition under Section 7 or 9 against a Corporate Debtor involved in winding up proceedings was not maintainable. The Tribunal set aside costs imposed on the appellant, concluding the application was not viable alongside existing winding up proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>